Both technologies promise non-surgical lifting, but they're profoundly different. Ultraformer MPT (HIFU) reaches the SMAS muscular layer for structural lifting. Radiofrequency works the dermis and is excellent for skin texture and quality. Choosing the right one depends on your specific goal.
How Each Technology Works
Ultraformer MPT (HIFU): emits high-intensity focused ultrasound that creates thermal coagulation points at exact depths (1.5mm, 3mm, 4.5mm). It reaches the SMAS layer — the same level a surgeon works on in a facelift. Triggers structural neocollagenesis.
Radiofrequency: heats the dermis using electromagnetic waves to a uniform temperature (40-42°C). Stimulates surface and middle collagen but doesn't reach the SMAS. Excellent for skin texture and quality.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Factor | Ultraformer MPT | Radiofrequency |
|---|---|---|
| Action depth | Up to 4.5mm (SMAS) | 2-3mm (dermis) |
| Sessions needed | 1 (annual maintenance) | 6-10 weekly |
| Result duration | 12-18 months | 3-6 months |
| Per-session pain | Mild-moderate | Very low |
| Visible structural lifting | Yes (significant) | Mild |
| Texture improvement | Yes | Yes (excellent) |
| Approximate price (full face) | $2.5M-3.8M COP (1 session) | $300K-500K per session |
| Total comparable cost | $2.5M-3.8M (1 year) | $3M-5M (10 sessions) |
When to Choose Each One
Choose Ultraformer MPT if:
- You have visible sagging on face, neck or jawline.
- You want to see real structural lifting.
- You can't or don't want to commit to 6-10 sessions.
- You're 35+ years old with moderate sagging.
Choose Radiofrequency if:
- You mainly want to improve skin texture and quality.
- You have minimal sagging.
- You like the regular maintenance routine.
- You have very low pain tolerance.
- You want a more accessible monthly investment.
Can They Be Combined?
Yes, and it's the most powerful combination. The recommended protocol is:
- Ultraformer MPT: 1 session for deep structural lifting (annual maintenance).
- Radiofrequency: monthly between Ultraformer MPT sessions, to maintain skin quality.
This combination offers the best result-cost ratio in non-invasive aesthetic medicine.
Medical references
The clinical claims on this page rest on public, verifiable sources. They are cited so you can check them, not as an endorsement of this practice by those organisations.
- Aesthetic Surgery Journal (2025) — systematic review of HIFU in skin tightening and body contouring
- Lasers in Medical Science (2020) — systematic review and meta-analysis of HIFU safety and efficacy for face and neck
- American Academy of Dermatology — wrinkles and treatment options
- INVIMA — medical device registration in Colombia
Want to know which is best for you?
Free evaluation consultation · El Poblado, Medellín
Book free consultationFrequently asked questions
Which is better, Ultraformer MPT or radiofrequency?
Ultraformer MPT for structural lifting; radiofrequency for textural improvement. They're complementary.
Can they be combined?
Yes, it's an excellent combination. Ultraformer MPT annually + monthly radiofrequency.
Which is more painful?
Ultraformer MPT can be slightly more uncomfortable; radiofrequency is generally very comfortable.